A Morning Tea at the Legislative Assembly Wednesday 12th November  A very yummy cake - but what? No candles!
 Mr Andrew Barr, the ACT Minister for Education and Training, Planning, Children and Young People, Tourism, Sport and Recreation and Carolyn Harkness, CPS Acting President. Carolyn remarked to the Minister, that his new portfolio is basically what is described in the 1952 Commonwealth Government Publication as what it will take to ensure that "... cities and towns may be developed as good places for
children to live in." Carolyn welcomed the Minister's public acknowledgement of the work undertaken by the CPS to support and promote the wonderful preschool system that we all enjoy.
|
| Preschool Parent Association Representatives, Past & Present CPS
Council members and various stakeholders to enjoy a morning tea at the
Legislative Assembly, Wednesday 12th November. The Minister for
Education & Training will officially open the exhibition and mark
the 65th Anniversary of our organisation. This event
is entirely sponsored by the ACT Legislative Assembly in recognition of
the work undertaken by Preschool Parent Associations to support and
deliver the ACT preschool program.Thank you for coming to join us
today, on the occasion of the 65th birthday of a Society that
represents not only a pioneering past – but also the image of community
spirit at its very best. I wish to thank the people who have come
today and applaud your commitment to our cause – the quality care and
education of children before compulsory schooling. The
Australian Capital Territory (ACT) preschool program serves over 90% of
eligible 4 year-olds. It is a significant phase of family life where,
in Canberra, parents often make an enormous effort to be involved in
the delivery of the program – often choosing to scale back work or
opting to juggling shift rotations to become involved in an
extraordinary display of volunteer effort and community spirit.
Parents contributed, in 2007, approximately $1.3 million to the
delivery of the program and managed an asset base of almost $6.7
million in teaching resources – their contribution and responsibility
in the delivery of the preschool program. It is an honour to represent
you here today. The
era of the suburban Pre-school came to the fore in the wake of the
Nursery Kindergarten movement in the 1930’s and early 1940’s. In a
period of post-war reconstruction, the Australian community experienced
a significant shortage of resources: human, material and financial.
Simultaneously, developments in the value of the early years of child
care and education stimulated public demand for young children to
participate in a program that would be of benefit whilst mothers were
freed up to undertake other duties. Canberra’s
social and economic situation, surprisingly, was little different to
that of today, and in 1944 the Ministry of the Interior commissioned
the development of a program that would extend the benefit of the
Canberra Nursery Kindergarten into the fledgling suburbs that
surrounded the civic region. The ambitious proposal incorporated a
collaborative “agreement” that effectively split the day-to-day fiscal
management and ownership [of the entity] between the government and the
parents of the young children enrolled in each suburban pre-school
centre. Throughout a
series of significant changes regarding the governance of the ACT, the
suburban preschool “agreement” remained relatively undisturbed. It
appears that, being a small-scale, successful program that met the
demands of high population growth in the 1970’s and 1980’s – preserved
the original arrangements – or kept it “under the radar”. In the
1990’s, under ACT self-government, the ACT preschool program
experienced a number of attempts to modify and reduce the amount of
government expenditure – whilst expecting more of the Preschool Parent
Association. Throughout the past decade, further attempts to alter the
preschool program revealed the presence of unidentified - yet disparate
views regarding the nature, purpose and power of the two participants:
the government and the Pre-school Parent Association. This
gives rise to some questions, like: why are parents willing to make
enormous domestic changes in order to manage their responsibilities in
program? What can the original ACT preschool program teach us about
developing successful community programs? And, finally, can those
lessons be translated into the questions of the development of future
early childhood initiatives to support the growth and development of
human and community capital? I
want to leave with you an extract of 1952 Commonwealth Government
publication, “Before School: the story of the Canberra pre-school
centres.”
Community education is
considered the foundation of any pre-school programme, and its scope
should be wider than parent education. Its aim should be to develop a
community which will be alive to the needs of children and be prepared
to take steps to meet them. It should stimulate the interest of
government authorities, town planners and architects, manufacturers and
retailers, so that cities and towns may be developed as good places for
children to live in … Depending on community approval and community
participation, a pre-school programme must make a positive and
continuing effort to interpret its principles to that community. People
should understand what is being done, and feel convinced that it is
important.
This vision is not lost on the
Canberra Preschool Society or its member Preschool and Playschool
Parent Associations. We rise to the challenge of change. This year,
virtually all Preschool Parent Associations have taken the opportunity
to review their role, some have decided to stop their original historic
partnership, whilst others have decided to remain, all have renewed
their vision, to work together to nurture and grow our children – and
to continue to build a strong community that is “alive to the needs of
children.”
Carolyn Harkness
CPS Acting President |